Sounds good to me then. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]>wrote:
> I can confirm that it does not, tested with Lucene 4.2. > > > > ________________________________ > From: Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:00 AM > Subject: Re: lucene 4.2.0? > > I wouldn't think so. Go for it. > > On Mar 19, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > Shouldn't affect compatibility with >= 4.0, should it? > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Any objection? > >> >
