Organizations support isn't sufficient? https://help.github.com/articles/what-s-the-difference-between-user-and-organization-accounts#organizations
I guess there's need for suborganizations for each apache project on github. Not sure if that's supported or feasible with existing organizations support. On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > The additional factor is that github doesn't provide sufficient control > over access to individual projects. If it were possible to ensure that > only committers had access to the github mirror, it would be plausible to > handle pull requests more directly, even with SVN as the primary repo. We > could handle the pull request using github and use git svn to push back to > SVN. > > Until github does that (and there is no motion in that direction), then > patches will rule. > > > > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Stevo Slavić <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I understand, thanks. This seems to be general ASF infra/policies and > > GitHub pull requests issue. > > Will continue to submit both pull requests on github and svn compatible > > patches attached to JIRA, and close pull requests by myself once patches > > get integrated/merged. > > > > Kind regards, > > Stevo Slavic. > > > > > > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > We talked about this but it is difficult to switch the user base except > > at > > > the beginning if a project. For drill, as an example, we started with > > git. > > > > > > Unfortunately that still doesn't solve the pull problem since the > apache > > > source on GitHub is just a mirror and can't push updates back to > apache. > > > > > > The only good news is that enough of use git that git formatted patches > > > are ok. > > > > > > On May 12, 2013, at 2:05, "Stevo Slavic (JIRA)" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > I wish Mahout used git as primary scm. > > > > > >
