[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13660752#comment-13660752
]
Hudson commented on MAHOUT-1219:
--------------------------------
Integrated in Mahout-Quality #2002 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Mahout-Quality/2002/])
MAHOUT-1219: LSHSearcher not always faster than BruteSearcher
The existing "benchmark" is not conclusive enough as it doesn't take into
account the adaptive nature of the JVM, doesn't run the test multiple times and
should be replaced with something more thorough.
Removing LSHSearcher from the tests for now. (Revision 1483799)
Result = SUCCESS
dfilimon :
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1483799
Files :
* /mahout/trunk/CHANGELOG
*
/mahout/trunk/core/src/test/java/org/apache/mahout/math/neighborhood/SearchQualityTest.java
> LSHSearcher not always faster than BruteSearcher
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAHOUT-1219
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1219
> Project: Mahout
> Issue Type: Test
> Affects Versions: 0.8
> Reporter: Dan Filimon
> Priority: Minor
>
> This is a known issue and the performance of LocalitySensitiveHashSearch
> needs to be further investigated.
> Currently, the one "benchmark" that does this, SearchQualityTest is too
> variable to be informative.
> So, I'm removing LSHSearcher from SearchQualityTest.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
