Ankur you will be pleasantly surprised how easy it is to develop an
algorithm using Mahout's vector classes.

Robin Anil | Software Engineer | +1 312 869 2602 | Google Inc.


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:

> We currently do not have any C++ code.
>
> The build complexity and maintenance and portability issues probably
> outweigh any advantages that I see at this time.
>
> We would love to have you contribute, but for now I think it is
> safest/easiest to assume Java.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Ankur Gupta <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > I want to contribute to mahout but one thing that holds me back is that I
> > want to develop in C++ (It is just the comfort level). Is there any part
> of
> > mahout which is developed in C++ or can be developed in C++. If so kindly
> > let me know so that I can start working on understanding that and soon
> > start contributing.
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Ankur
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > No.
> > >
> > > Mahout doesn't have any multi-level neural network implementation at
> this
> > > time.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jun 4, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Mimi Tam wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd like to phrase the question a bit differently.
> > > >
> > > > Does Mahout have a neural network algorithm (did it adopt Neuroph's
> or
> > > native)?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message----- From: Mimi Tam
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 10:08 AM
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Question on Mahout (adopted FANN libraries?) if I may...
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I am a late comer.
> > > >
> > > > Did Mahout/Mahout-36 [GSOC] Proposal to implement Neural Network with
> > > > backpropagation learning on Hadoop ever implemented and is part of
> > Mahout
> > > > now?
> > > >
> > > > Is this using the FANN libraries?
> > > >
> > > > Many Thanks...Mimi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message----- From: Robin Anil (JIRA)
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 9:51 AM
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: [jira] [Updated] (MAHOUT-1240) Randomized testing and
> > > Serialization
> > > > of NonZeros
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >    [
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
> > > > ]
> > > >
> > > > Robin Anil updated MAHOUT-1240:
> > > > -------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >   Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)
> > > >
> > > >> Randomized testing and Serialization of NonZeros
> > > >> ------------------------------------------------
> > > >>
> > > >>                Key: MAHOUT-1240
> > > >>                URL:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1240
> > > >>            Project: Mahout
> > > >>         Issue Type: Bug
> > > >>           Reporter: Robin Anil
> > > >>           Assignee: Robin Anil
> > > >>            Fix For: 0.8
> > > >>
> > > >>        Attachments: MAHOUT-1240.patch
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Currently the nonZero iterator does not guarantee nonZero iteration
> > for
> > > certain vectors (RASV, SASV) for performance reason. However vector
> view
> > > iterator adds a zero check.. To be correct we have to either remove the
> > > check or do correct non zero serialization everywhere. However this
> means
> > > going over the vectors in two passes. Given that is pretty fast
> already,
> > I
> > > am fixing the logic bug. We can tackle the speed up for the next
> release.
> > > >> This also adds a randomized test for serialization that catches all
> > > such bugs.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > > > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> > > > administrators
> > > > For more information on JIRA, see:
> > > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to