We have a good spread of people filling out both versions of the Doodle :) Here's the one Grant said is the correct one:

http://doodle.com/ymqaiwbh7khisnyv

On 6/12/13 1:44 PM, Andrew Musselman wrote:
Bi-weekly is good for me; I'm in Seattle and just filled out the poll.

Great idea!


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com>wrote:

+1, am in Seattle as well and would love to attend and be involved.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 12, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Ravi Mummulla <ravi.mummu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Good idea on recurring meetings. Im very interested in participating.
Biweekly works for me. I'm in Seattle (pacific) timezone - GMT-8.

An agenda for the meetings ahead of time will help us get the most of our
time at the meetings.

Thanks.
On Jun 12, 2013 6:23 AM, "Grant Ingersoll" <gsing...@apache.org> wrote:

On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Shannon Quinn <squ...@gatech.edu> wrote:

Angel and Suneel, you may want to re-fill out the new doodle.

FYI, this week won't be representative of my schedule; I'm in the last
few weeks of a job at ORNL where I travel every weekend. Normally I'll
have
more flexibility than just 6pm on weeknights.

Yeah, Doodle makes you pick dates, but I just want it to be
representative
a week long period of time and not tied to a specific set of dates.  So,
just put in what your ideal times are in general and ignore the fact
that
it is set to next week.

On 6/12/13 8:26 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Shannon Quinn <squ...@gatech.edu> wrote:

+1, awesome idea

One question: the poll, while set to GMT -5, does say it's in Central
Time. Is this a daylight savings thing?
I turned on Time Zone support, so not sure how it will look to others,
but it sounds like it adjusts based on your location...  I see: 8 am,
10,
1, so on.
I also realize, that I messed it up.  I meant 9 pm, not 9 am.

Here is the correct one: http://doodle.com/ymqaiwbh7khisnyv
--------------------------------------------
Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers
http://www.lucidworks.com







Reply via email to