+1
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > I pointed a project that uses Mahout to this staging repo. The compile and > package went properly and my IDE was able to download and attach sources > correctly. > > I manually pulled down a few artifacts and noodled around in them and they > seemed good. > > I didn't check signature yet. > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Applying a forcing function: > > > > Please vote on releasing the 0.8 artifacts at > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-113/org/apache/mahout/ > > . > > > > Release notes are at > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Release+0.8 > > > > [] +1 Looks good > > [] 0 - No opinion > > [] -1 Don't release > > > > Vote criteria from https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > > > > What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? > > Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval > > -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, > > and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be > > vetoed. Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed > > source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting > > executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the > > package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases. > > > > Thanks, > > Grant >
