Will schedule a hangout for this Thursday - 7pm (Eastern Time) tentatively.
I would like us to first discuss about Mahout 0.9 release, will send out an agenda once I schedule it. Regards, Suneel On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:24 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> wrote: Following up , Suneel/Grant are we still on for meeting this week on a google hangout, would love to neet this week. > From: sxk1...@hotmail.com > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: RE: Mahout's future > Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 07:00:50 -0700 > > +1Can you send out a quick agenda (hopefully with my input incorporated) > before the hangout?Regards > > Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 03:58:10 -0700 > > From: suneel_mar...@yahoo.com > > Subject: Re: Mahout's future > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > > > > Grant would be available the week of Oct 14 for a hangout (tentatively). > > We could go ahead and schedule one next week if there's (and seems very > > much like it) enough response. I can go ahead and facilitate one. > > > > I will be 100% focused on Mahout from next week once I start at my new job > > from Monday. > > > > Regarding building something for Deep Learning, Yexi's patch for MLP (see > > M-1265) may be a good place to refactor/start thinking about the > > foundations. > > I guess Ted is alluring to build something like what's been described in > > the Google paper (see > > http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~ranzato/publications/DistBeliefNIPS2012_withAppendix.pdf). > > Correct? > > > > > > Suneel > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > > To: "dev@mahout.apache.org" <dev@mahout.apache.org> > > Cc: "dev@mahout.apache.org" <dev@mahout.apache.org> > > Sent: Sunday, October 6, 2013 2:10 AM > > Subject: Re: Mahout's future > > > > > > Saikat > > > > These are all good suggestions. I would have a hard time suggesting a > > prioritization of them. > > > > Does anybody remember what grant said about having another hangout? > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Oct 6, 2013, at 7:15, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I wanted to mention a few other things:1)It might be useful to take and > > > embed a few already productionalized use cases into the integration tests > > > in mahout, this will help additional users get on board faster2) Deep > > > learning is really interesting, however I'd like to help research some > > > common use cases first before tying this into mahout3) It'd be good to > > > put some thought into documenting when you would choose what type of > > > algorithm given a production machine learning recommendation system to > > > build, this would give more visibility for users into choosing the right > > > mixture of algorithms to build a production ready recommender, often what > > > I've found is that a bulk of the time in building productionalized > > > recommenders is spent cleaning and filtering noisy data4) I'd like to > > > also explore how to tie in machine learning algorithms into real time > > > systems built using twitter storm (http://storm-project.net/), it seems > > > that industry more and more is wanting > > to do real time analytics on the fly, I'm curious what type of algorithms > >we'd need for this and back propagate these into mahout > > > > > > It'd be good to meet like minded devs together locally (Seattle) or over > > > gtalk/conference to talk through possibilities. > > > Regards > > >> From: ted.dunn...@gmail.com > > >> Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 18:13:40 -0700 > > >> Subject: Re: Mahout's future > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org > > >> > > >> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Does it make sense to have a quick meeting of interested developers over > > >>> google chat/conference rather than email to discuss and assign folks to > > >>> specifics? > > >>> > > >>> Thoughts? > > >> > > >> Great idea. > > >> > > >> I think that Grant may have been organizing a hangout. > > > >
