I am working on M-1265.
2013/11/28 Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> > Update on Open JIRAs for 0.9: > > Mahout-1245, Mahout-1304, Mahout-1305, Mahout-1307, Mahout-1326 - all > related to Wiki updates, please see Isabel's updates. > > M-1286 - Peng and Sebastian, we had talked about this during the last > hangout. Can this be included in 0.9? > > M-1030- Andrew Musselman, its critical that we get this into 0.9, its been > deferred for last 2 Mahout releases. > > M-1319, M-1328, M-1347, M-1350 - Suneel > > > M-1265 - Multi Layer Perceptron, Yexi please look at my comments on > Reviewboard. > > M-1273 - Kun Yung, Ted, defer this to next release ??? > > > > M-1312, M-1256 - Stevo, could u take one of them > > On Thursday, November 28, 2013 5:01 AM, Isabel Drost-Fromm < > [email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:23:11 -0800 (PST) > Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Below are the Open issues for 0.9:- > > This looks like we should be targeting Dec. 9th as code freeze to me. > What do you all think? > > > > Mahout-1245, Mahout-1304, Mahout-1305, Mahout-1307, Mahout-1326 - All > > related to Wiki updates, missing Wiki documentation and Wiki > > migration to new CMS. Isabel's working on M-1245 (migrating to new > > CMS). Could some of the others be consolidated with that? > > I believe MAHOUT-1245 essentially is ready to be published - all I want > before notifying INFRA to > switch to the new cms based site is one other > person to take at least a brief look. > > For MAHOUT-1304 - Sebastian, can you please check that the cms based > site actually does fit on 1280px? We can close this issue then. > > MAHOUT-1305 - I think this should be turned into a task to actually > delete most of the pages that have been migrated to the new CMS (almost > all of them). Once 1245 is shipped, it would be great if a few more > people could lend a hand in getting this done. > > MAHOUT-1307 - Can be closed once switched to CMS > > MAHOUT-1326 - This really relates to the old Confluence export plugin > we once have been using to generate static pages out of our wiki that > is no longer active. Unless anyone on the Mahout dev list > knows how to > fully delete all exported static pages we should file an issue with > INFRA to ask for help getting those deleted. They definitely are > confusing to users. > > > > > M-1286 - Peng and ssc, we had talked about this during the last > > hangout. Can this be included in 0.9? > > > > M-1030 - Andrew Musselman? Any updates on this, its important that we > > fix this for 0.9 > > > > M-1319, M-1328, > > M-1347, M-1364 - Suneel > > > > M-1273 - Kun Yung, remember talking about this in one of the earlier > > hangouts; can't recall what was decided? > > > > M-1312, M-1256 - Dan Filimon (or Stevo??) > > > > M-996 someone could pick this up (if its still relevant with present > > codebase i.e.) > > I think this can move to the next release - according to the > contributor and Sebastian the patch is rather hacky and there for > illustration purposes only. I'd rather see some more thought go into > that instead of pushing to have this in 0.9. > > > > M-1265 Yexi had submitted a patch for this, it would be good if this > > could go in as part of 0.9 > > > > M-1288 Solr Recommender - Pat Ferrell > > > > M-1285: Any takers for this? > > Would be nice to have - in particular if someone on dev@ (not > necessarily a committer) wants to get started with the code base. > Otherwise I'd say fix for next release if time gets short. > > > > M-1356: Isabel's started on this, Stevo could u review this? > > We definitely can punt that for the next release or even thereafter. It > would be great if someone who has some knowledge of Java security > policies would take a look. The implication of not fixing this > essentially is that in case someone commits test code that writes > outside of target or to some globally shared directory we might end up > having randomly failing tests due to the parallel setup again. But as > these will occur shortly after the commit it should be easy enough to > find the code change that caused the breakage. > > > > > M-1329: Support for Hadoop 2 > > Is that truly feasable within a week? > > > > M-1366: Stevo, Isabel ???? > > This should be done as part of the release process by release manager > at the latest. > > > > M-1261: Sebastian??? > > > > M-1309, M-1310, M-1311, M-1316 - all related to running Mahout on > > Windows ?? > > I'm not aware of us supporting Windows. > > > > M-1350 - Any takers?? (Stevo??) > > To me this looks like a broken classpath on the user side. Without a > patch to at least re-produce the issue I wouldn't spend too much time > > on this. > > > Isabel > -- ------ Yexi Jiang, ECS 251, [email protected] School of Computer and Information Science, Florida International University Homepage: http://users.cis.fiu.edu/~yjian004/
