I understand that neural networks aren't perfectly suitable for MapReduce.
But if there is very large network and lagre training set it seems to be a
good solution to use MapReduce.

RBMs and Autoencoders are used for pretraining.  It allows to learn better
representation for deep architectures (acording to
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~bengioy/papers/ftml_book.pdf). Deep supervised
multi-layer Neural Networks are very hard to train, starting from random
initialization.



On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Suneel Marthi (JIRA) <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>     [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13911680#comment-13911680]
>
> Suneel Marthi commented on MAHOUT-1426:
> ---------------------------------------
>
> The classifier.mlp is a supercised classifier based on Online learning
> training using SGD.  There are old JIRAs that had RBM implementation (not
> MapReduce)  - Mahout-968 and one for Autoencoders (MAhout-732). Both of
> which never made it to the codebase.
>
> > GSOC 2013 Neural network algorithms
> > -----------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: MAHOUT-1426
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1426
> >             Project: Mahout
> >          Issue Type: Improvement
> >          Components: Classification
> >            Reporter: Maciej Mazur
> >
> > I would like to ask about possibilites of implementing neural network
> algorithms in mahout during GSOC.
> > There is a classifier.mlp package with neural network.
> > I can't see neighter RBM  nor Autoencoder in these classes.
> > There is only one word about Autoencoders in NeuralNetwork class.
> > As far as I know Mahout doesn't support convolutional networks.
> > Is it a good idea to implement one of these algorithms?
> > Is it a reasonable amount of work?
> > How hard is it to get GSOC in Mahout?
> > Did anyone succeed last year?
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
> (v6.1.5#6160)
>

Reply via email to