Any word on this?
> On Mar 4, 2014, at 3:45 PM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > I believe there was an announcement that went out last month about Apache SF > embracing github. - > http://jaxenter.com/apache-ups-github-integration-potential-49460.html > > Guess this is more of an INFRA task than anything we need to do (like the > recent setting up of svnpubsub for future releases). > > I can create an INFRA jira and wait for INFRA to take respond. > > > > > On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 6:03 PM, Andrew Musselman > <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > One of my big wishlist items is to move Mahout to Github for workflow and > community features. > > I remember there being discussion a while back but is there any way to move > our Subversion repo to an Apache Git repo? > > >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I would like to start a conversation about where we want Mahout to be for >> 1.0. Let's suspend for the moment the question of how to achieve the >> goals. Instead, let's converge on what we really would like to have happen >> and after that, let's talk about means that will get us there. >> >> Here are some goals that I think would be good in the area of numerics, >> classifiers and clustering: >> >> - runs with or without Hadoop >> >> - runs with or without map-reduce >> >> - includes (at least), regularized generalized linear models, k-means, >> random forest, distributed random forest, distributed neural networks >> >> - reasonably competitive speed against other implementations including >> graphlab, mlib and R. >> >> - interactive model building >> >> - models can be exported as code or data >> >> - simple programming model >> >> - programmable via Java or R >> >> - runs clustered or not >> >> >> What does everybody think?
