yes, sorry, i misread it.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Severs, Chris <csev...@ebay.com> wrote: > To be clear, I meant what Ted said here. Mahout has some great stuff in > it that I would love to see merged with H2O. > > > On Mar 13, 2014, at 6:24 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> At least one of your users here reported it does not make sense to run > >> Mahout on all this, and at least two of us have trouble seeing how such > >> disassembly and reassembly might take place. What are your thoughts on > >> this? > >> How clearly you realize the reintegration roadmap? > > > > To clarify, what I heard the user say was that it doesn't make sense to > run > > Mahout instead of h2o as Mahout currently stands. > > > > That is very different from not making sense to run Mahout after changes > to > > use the virtues of h2o. >
