Regarding mechanics, the fact that we have profiles available to do the build already should make the process very simple ... roughly just adding -Phadoop2 or some such. Internally, it is setting a few symbols and tweaking the dependencies slightly.
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]>wrote: > +1 for something like that. Again, spark just makes tons of binary releases > bound to a specific flavor of H-1 or H-2 including CDH etc. > > Not sure if it is totally feasible with just build techniques (the > ubiquitous #ifdef macros immediately spring up in mind, something i am > totally not missing in java) but if it is, it is the way to go. > > > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Gokhan Capan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My vote would be releasing mahout with hadoop1 and hadoop2 classifiers > > > > Gokhan > > > > > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Sebastian Schelter < > > [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > > Big +1 > > > Am 23.05.2014 15:33 schrieb "Ted Dunning" <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > What do folks think about spinning out a new version of 0.9 that only > > > > changes which version of Hadoop the build uses? > > > > > > > > There have been quite a few questions lately on this topic. > > > > > > > > My suggestion would be that we use minor version numbering to > maintain > > > this > > > > and the normal 0.9 release simultaneously if we decide to do a bug > fix > > > > release. > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > >
