Sounds good thanks, so does the plan I outlined make sense as far as adding some meat to the classes I introduced, my apologies for commenting in JIRA I thought that was standard procedure for working on an issue.
> Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 10:33:46 -0700 > Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-1490) Data frame R-like bindings > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > Saikat, your PR doesn't have enough substance to be merged. I want to see > where it is all headed. Can you commit something more well-rounded? > > Also could you please comment off Jira for unrelated issues (such as > github/commit process issues etc.), it is getting pretty filled up > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Saikat Kanjilal (JIRA) > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > [ > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14011219#comment-14011219] > > > > Saikat Kanjilal commented on MAHOUT-1490: > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > Dmitry, > > I dont see my code merged in from my pull request when I look at > > https://github.com/dlyubimov/mahout/tree/MAHOUT-1490-a, did I miss > > something. Also I was planning to continue adding methods into the 4 > > classes that I introduced (StringDataFrameVector,IntegerDataFrameVector > > etc), does that sound like a plan? Let me know your thoughts on next steps. > > > > > Data frame R-like bindings > > > -------------------------- > > > > > > Key: MAHOUT-1490 > > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1490 > > > Project: Mahout > > > Issue Type: New Feature > > > Reporter: Saikat Kanjilal > > > Assignee: Dmitriy Lyubimov > > > Fix For: 1.0 > > > > > > Original Estimate: 20h > > > Remaining Estimate: 20h > > > > > > Create Data frame R-like bindings for spark > > > > > > > > -- > > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > > (v6.2#6252) > >
