I agree with Dmitriy. I note also the formatting on a desktop browser could be improved(e.g., fixed-font code blocks), and that on my phone it looks "off."
If we want to send people to this we will want to tidy things up I think. On Jun 17, 2014, at 6:24 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would not bring overly complicated examples. > Show us how we would add a new computed column, group, aggregate, type > conversion manipulations, etc. > > Anything that helps us to understand what it is we can do in shortest > format possible. Current text IMO doesn't do that. > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Saikat Kanjilal <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I will refocus the blog on concrete use cases tied into the workflow of >> using a Dataframe within mahout oriented perhaps towards a set of >> algorithms focused on clustering, does that sound like a reasonable first >> step? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 6:15 PM, "Dmitriy Lyubimov" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> This blog IMO desperately needs conrete use examples, not apis. >>> I would also remove R-specific examples as inconsequential. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Saikat Kanjilal <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Folks,I'm currently adding some bits to an earlier commit I had done >>>> for Mahout-1490 to add a thin set of APIs around a dataframe, I was >> going >>>> to refine the blog specified here ( >> http://mlefforts.blogspot.com/2014/04/introduction-this-proposal-will.html >> ) >>>> to include these APIs but before I put any more effort and time into >> this >>>> as well as into the code I wanted to ask if there's actual interest in >> the >>>> developer/committer community to support this and move it into mahout. >>>> Please let me know thoughts and feedback and a general direction so >> that I >>>> can either continue or redirect these efforts per the current need. >>>> Thanks in advance. >>
