On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Finally, I don't view our mission as limited to the DSL work.  We should
> > also accept/generate useful applications of the DSL.
> >
> >
> I thought that's what i said as well.


Cool.  I had thought that this was consensus, but got a different
impression from you last comments.

All's well that ends with consensus to misquote the Bard.


> I'd be happy if we could demonstrate
> a custom e2e application using mahout components for feature extraction,
> vectorization, solution and postprocessing in a few month. In that sense
> the woefully missing stuff here is feature extraction and frames.
>

Indeed.  I am seriously hoping that my day job drops below 60 hours soon so
I can spend some time on the feature extraction part.


> real time streaming such as Spark streaming would requite a bit more
> thinking, it is not clear to me  how we could abstract such capabilities in
> engine-independent way at this point, and even if there's much merit in
> doing that rather than writing algorithms directly for streaming, if that's
> the idea here. But streaming algorithms still can mix in other mahout
> components, which would make them quasi-mahout algorithms of second kind i
> mentioned.


Yeah... I think that we have agreement here as well ... the Spark Streaming
application writers are more likely to be consumers of Mahout than
suppliers of additional algorithms.

Reply via email to