[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14081093#comment-14081093
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov commented on MAHOUT-1500:
------------------------------------------
The reason additional review on github is needed is because i only spent ~5
minutes eyeballing less than 10% of the code which spawned 5 or so notes and
subsequent fixes. In that sense, help is needed. Surely, benefits of cross peer
code review should really require no specific justification. This is code
review on github (which is our reviewboard replacement) -- you just need to
look at the code, poke it if possible, leave suggestions, or just say "ship
it". I know, reviewboard was pain to use, but github PRs are so easy, so
there's practically no pretext left not to do it as much as possible.
Which begs the question. All these people who apparently said "ship it" on
github, excluding 0xdata review, produced exactly 0 code notes. Either review
were even more superficial than mine, or it is the most impeccable code patch
in the history of the project.
> H2O integration
> ---------------
>
> Key: MAHOUT-1500
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1500
> Project: Mahout
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Anand Avati
> Fix For: 1.0
>
>
> Provide H2O backend for the Mahout DSL
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
