On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote:
I suppose in that context LLR is considered a distance (higher scores mean > more `distant` items, co-occurring by chance only)? > Self-correction on this one -- having given a quick look at llr paper again, it looks like it is actually a similarity (higher scores meaning more stable co-occurrences, i.e. it moves in the opposite direction of p-value if it had been a classic test > [1] http://ssc.io/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/rec11-schelter.pdf > > -d >
