Yes that's what I said there, I think. Both are large. This is not a critical issue. Koloboke was faster for me but depends on what you're doing. I like the API a bit better and more modern IMHO; this is why I prefer it really. It plays better with Java 8. On Jan 18, 2015 3:27 PM, "Sebastiano Vigna" <vi...@di.unimi.it> wrote:
> > > On 18 Jan 2015, at 09:18, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > FWIW I prefer Koloboke at this stage. Fastutil is Apache licensed, both > > are. The only drawback is the massive size of the dependency. > > Huh? Koloboke's implementation jar is *larger* than fastutil's! Check on > Maven Central. > > In the typical range of sparse vectors, fastutil is also slightly faster. > > tests.maptests.prim_object.FastUtilIntObjectMapTest (10000) = > 796.4631357999999 > tests.maptests.prim_object.HftcIntObjectMapTest (10000) = 901.6948074 > tests.maptests.prim_object.FastUtilIntObjectMapTest (100000) = 1109.0534656 > tests.maptests.prim_object.HftcIntObjectMapTest (100000) = 1172.1181604 > > (This are get() calls on int -> Object maps, performance on int -> doubles > will be equivalent). > > The difference might vanish soon though, as after the > java-performance.info tests everybody is looking at everybody else's code. > > Ciao, > > seba > >
