Jay, what r the timelines for BigTop 0.9 release ? On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Seems like a good reason to release legacy, if only to get hadoop 2 > > Doesn’t seem like a good idea to drop legacy stuff unless it’s no longer > used enough to support. The recommender stuff is still actively being used > from Stack Overflow and the user list questions—even the in core code. I > answer questions as best I can and try to steer them to newer stuff but > it’s not time to retire that yet IMO. > > On Mar 6, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > What's the timeline for the BigTop 0.9 Release ? Mahout 0.9 had no support > for Hadoop 2x and hence the issue u had reported, but we have it now (and > its all legacy to be removed in a future release). > > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:31 PM, jay vyas <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Mahout. We are prepping for 0.9 Release of bigtop. > > > > Is anyone in the mahout community interested in collaborating with us > > around selecting a mahout version, and confirming it works? We can do > the > > testing on our end, possibly just fire up a google hangout and do it over > > screen share to resolve any issues. > > > > In bigtop 0.8, we released a version of mahout which didnt work properly > on > > yarn (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1470), so we are > really > > pushing hard to find collaborators in the communities which we package, > > rather than doing it all on our own :). > > > > jay vyas > > > > PS IMO I think if mahout and bigtop collaborate on releases, its a big > win > > for both projects (I feel this way also about other partners in the > hadoop > > ecosystem). If the packaging of mahout inside of bigtop isn't of > interest > > to anyone in this list, I'm happy to stop sending bigtop related > > information, just let me know. > > > >
