+1, 

would help if the comments were on the jira so Andrew and I stay on the same 
page

On Mar 24, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote:

I had the same idea myself. i like it.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Stevo Slavić <[email protected]> wrote:

> If I understand correctly, mrlegacy should remain, just hdfs/non-mr stuff
> extracted into separate module, for reuse in math-scala and mahout-spark
> module, so they do not depend on mrlegacy?
> 
> Maybe we should rename mrlegacy to mahout-mr or mahout-mapred or
> mahout-mapreduce. Legacy, if kept in master branch doesn't mean anything.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Stevo Slavic.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Pat Ferrel (JIRA) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>    [
>> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14378530#comment-14378530
>> ]
>> 
>> Pat Ferrel commented on MAHOUT-1655:
>> ------------------------------------
>> 
>> We can work together if you want to start a "MAHOUT-1655" branch on your
>> personal github repo.
>> 
>>> Refactor module dependencies
>>> ----------------------------
>>> 
>>>                Key: MAHOUT-1655
>>>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1655
>>>            Project: Mahout
>>>         Issue Type: Improvement
>>>         Components: mrlegacy
>>>           Reporter: Pat Ferrel
>>>           Assignee: Andrew Musselman
>>>           Priority: Critical
>>>            Fix For: 0.10.0
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Make a new module, call it mahout-hadoop. Move anything there that is
>> currently in mrlegacy but used in math-scala or spark. Remove
> dependencies
>> on mrlegacy altogether if possible by using other core classes.
>>> The goal is to have math-scala and spark module depend on math, and a
>> small module called mahout-hadoop (much smaller than mrlegacy).
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>> (v6.3.4#6332)
>> 
> 

Reply via email to