I agree to keep them separate, didn't mean to replace one with another, was just proposing to link them in JIRA, so it's easier to find out form JIRA itself this information you gave me - that upgrade all isn't all truly, that the lucene upgrade is separate ticket.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote: > Not really, because Lucene upgrade involves some code rework; best to keep > them separate IMO > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Stevo Slavić <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, I'm aware of that other JIRA, thanks. Maybe we can link the two, as > > related issues in JIRA. > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Suneel Marthi (JIRA) <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > [ > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14383766#comment-14383766 > > > ] > > > > > > Suneel Marthi commented on MAHOUT-1650: > > > --------------------------------------- > > > > > > Stevo, FYI there is another Jira for Lucene 5 upgrade that Frank's > > working > > > on, so this Jira would only have to deal with non-lucene upgrades. > > > > > > > Upgrade all 3rd party jars to the most recent versions and fix code > to > > > be Lucene 5.0 compatible > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > Key: MAHOUT-1650 > > > > URL: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1650 > > > > Project: Mahout > > > > Issue Type: Improvement > > > > Components: CLI > > > > Affects Versions: 0.9 > > > > Reporter: Suneel Marthi > > > > Assignee: Stevo Slavic > > > > Fix For: 0.10.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > The title pretty much is self-descriptive, otherwise modify the code > > > using Lucene to account for the recent changes in Lucene > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > > > (v6.3.4#6332) > > > > > >
