Someone verify the sigs and hashs, then yes Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 4, 2015, at 1:34 PM, Andrew Musselman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > That's three votes; agree to release this RC? > >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Andrew Palumbo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Built and tested src zip and tar all tests passed >> >> Ran through several options for each classification and clustering >> example script in pseudo-cluster mode using the src tar build without >> any unexpected incident. >> >> Tested the shell in pseudo-cluster mode. >> >> +1 (binding) >> >>> On 08/04/2015 12:23 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: >>> Built and Tested {src} * {zip,tar} and all tests pass >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Andrew Musselman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Looks good on EMR with the 3.8 AMI, which contains Amazon's Hadoop >> 2.4-v5 >>>> and Spark 1.3.1. >>>> >>>> All examples that worked in the 0.10 release still work, with breakage >>>> happening on the cluster-reuters option 1, like last time, which is >> still >>>> not a blocker in my view. Need to lose the random forest stuff in 11.1 >>>> (recorded in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1759). >>>> >>>> +1 binding >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Andrew Musselman < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Getting this error running classify-20newsgroups.sh #3 in distributed >>>> mode: >>>>> 15/08/03 18:27:09 INFO rdd.SequenceFileRDDFunctions: Saving as sequence >>>>> file of type (IntWritable,VectorWritable) >>>>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: >>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Class >>>>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.DirectFileOutputCommitter not found >>>>> at >> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:1927) >>>>> at >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getOutputCommitter(JobConf.java:722) >>>>> at >> org.apache.spark.rdd.PairRDDFunctions.saveAsHadoopFile(PairRDDFunctions.scala:948) >>>>> at >> org.apache.spark.rdd.SequenceFileRDDFunctions.saveAsSequenceFile(SequenceFileRDDFunctions.scala:103) >>>>> at >> org.apache.mahout.sparkbindings.drm.CheckpointedDrmSpark.dfsWrite(CheckpointedDrmSpark.scala:163) >>>>> at >> org.apache.mahout.classifier.naivebayes.NBModel.dfsWrite(NBModel.scala:105) >>>>> at >> org.apache.mahout.drivers.TrainNBDriver$.process(TrainNBDriver.scala:107) >>>>> at >> org.apache.mahout.drivers.TrainNBDriver$$anonfun$main$1.apply(TrainNBDriver.scala:77) >>>>> at >> org.apache.mahout.drivers.TrainNBDriver$$anonfun$main$1.apply(TrainNBDriver.scala:75) >>>>> at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:145) >>>>> at >> org.apache.mahout.drivers.TrainNBDriver$.main(TrainNBDriver.scala:75) >>>>> at org.apache.mahout.drivers.TrainNBDriver.main(TrainNBDriver.scala) >>>>> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: >> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: >>>>> Class org.apache.hadoop.mapred.DirectFileOutputCommitter not found >>>>> at >> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:1895) >>>>> at >> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:1919) >>>>> ... 11 more >>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Class >>>>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.DirectFileOutputCommitter not found >>>>> at >> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClassByName(Configuration.java:1801) >>>>> at >> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:1893) >>>>> ... 12 more >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Stevo Slavić <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sorry for confusion, I thought it was for all artifacts. Suneel >>>> clarified, >>>>>> it was just about not-merged change for distribution archives from >>>> 0.10.x >>>>>> to 0.11.x/master branch. Will verify releases and cast my vote later >>>>>> today. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>> Stevo Slavic. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Is this Apache wide? It’s silly if not. We shouldn’t make this >>>> decision >>>>>> in >>>>>>> a vacuum. Seems like the defacto standard is not to include “Apache" >>>> in >>>>>> the >>>>>>> artifact, I can’t think of anyone else who does. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:29 AM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> We made that change on 0.10.x branch but was not merged in master, >>>>>> that's >>>>>>> all that was there to be done. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Otherwise I agree with what u r saying. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 4:48 AM, Stevo Slavić <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This keeps coming up often in recent releases, and I keep referring >>>> to >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1680 where it was >>>>>> decided >>>>>>> only >>>>>>>> to have distribution artifact/acrhive have "apache" prefix. Did >>>>>> something >>>>>>>> change since then? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> None of the Apache projects, java libraries, that I use, have apache >>>>>>> prefix >>>>>>>> in their artifact name. It's though part of their groupId. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If artifactId changes, people depending transitively and directly to >>>>>>> Mahout >>>>>>>> modules might get classpath issues - same class, two different >>>>>>>> versions/APIs, and depending on class loader different one may be >>>>>> loaded >>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> different context, or even fail to load. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>>> Stevo Slavic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Rolling back this release, there's a discrepancy in the artifact >>>>>> naming >>>>>>>>> that needs to be addressed; will send an update when a new Release >>>>>>>>> candidate is available. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected] >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> This is the vote for release 0.11.0 of Apache Mahout. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on >>>>>>>>>> Wednesday, >>>>>>>>>> August 5th, 2015. Please download, test and vote with >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.11.0 release of Apache Mahout >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0, I don't care either way, >>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.11.0 release of Apache >>>>>>> Mahout, >>>>>>>>>> because... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maven staging repo: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1012 >>>>>>>>>> < >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1012/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.11.0/ >>>>>>>>>> < >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebigtop-1001 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The git tag to be voted upon is release-0.11.0 >> >>
