I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla (non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will allow users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will suffice.
There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should know better. We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same page. Thanks Suneel and Stevo. On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> wrote: > If I understood problem and goal well: > - module with native code has to be included in the release > -- module version change only and I guess documentation published but > -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging binary/jar etc. > and > -- distribution module should include sources of module with native code > too > - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources distribution, > for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything including > their own jar of native module for given target architecture. > > This is not easy to achieve with Maven. > > Kind regards, > Stevo Slavic. > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or being > > shadowed ? i can take a look later tonight. > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman < > > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands the > fine > > > points of making things like this works? > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman < > > > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 > release:prepare > > > >> release:perform > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile > > > >> > > > >> ________________________________ > > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess > > is > > > >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have something > > to > > > do > > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time. > > > >> > > > >> ________________________________ > > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; u...@mahout.apache.org > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate > > > >> > > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know? > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro: > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > bin > > > >> > > > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar > > > >> > > > > >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log > > > >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib > > > >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt > > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md > > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar > > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp > > > >> > > > > >> > ________________________________ > > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM > > > >> > To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate > > > >> > > > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests > for > > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles. > > > >> > > > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in > the > > > >> binary > > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised > > when > > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the > > CPU > > > >> get > > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source. > > > >> > > > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding). > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman < > > > >> > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed > on > > > >> > Friday, > > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding > votes > > > >> > (whichever > > > >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with > > > >> > > > > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache > Mahout > > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way, > > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of > Apache > > > >> Mahout, > > > >> > > because... > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Maven staging repo: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > * > > > >> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout- > > distribution/0.13.0/ > > > >> > > < > > > >> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout- > > distribution/0.13.0/ > > > >> > >* > > > >> > > > > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
