I mean, I'd call for a 72hour lazy consensus if not an all out vote first. In general I like it though
On May 18, 2017 5:15 PM, "Pat Ferrel" <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > Ok, is there a catch? Why would we not do this? > > If someone wants to talk about GH going down, I’d still take the risk over > running our own git. I can imagine a zillion other interesting things for > infra to do rather than guarantee some SLA on our own git servers. > > Did I miss some negative post? I’ll Jira Infra if you are asking for a > volunteer. If someone doesn’t like this please speak up. > > > On May 18, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > my bad. Yes taht's what I mean. > > https://gitbox.apache.org/ > > we have to link our github accounts to asf accounts and turn on two-factor > authentication. > > and talk to infra > > Trevor Grant > Data Scientist > https://github.com/rawkintrevo > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo > http://trevorgrant.org > > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil* > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > > > What, actual hosting on GH so merging PRs and reviewing with the GUI? > This > > would open up a whole new toolchain, +1 > > > > I’ll write that Jira if that’s what you mean. > > > > BTW github is mirroring the ASF git server, not svn afaik. > > > > > > On May 17, 2017, at 7:39 AM, Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Apache now supports using GitHub as primary repo (not mirroring svn). > > > > Process is to open an infra ticket. Just tossing a feeler out to see if > > we'd be interested in doing this. > > > > > >