Sorry for delayed reply. I like simply dropping the 0. from the front more bc it is consistent and we are simply following an arbitrary directive to move out of 0. land.
a 1.0 release in my mind should be some major milestone which I don't think we really did. Just my .02 On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:38 PM Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am ok with 1.0 > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 6:10 PM Andrew Musselman < > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > We've been discussing moving to a 1.0 release for a few years now. This > > past quarter we had a comment on our board report about whether we would > > consider getting out of the 0.x releases. > > > > I think it makes sense especially since we've had major overhauls a > > couple/few times now, which is one sign of a matured project. > > > > Instead of moving to 1.0, however, I would like to propose moving to 14.1 > > for our next release. This would recognize that for several years the > > project has been ready to use, while keeping a similar historical release > > ordering. > > > > Any thoughts on moving to that numbering scheme? Further releases could > > increment the minor version and have hot fixes in point releases, or we > > could just increment the major version for a yearly release, say. > > >
