1. The scenario you described will work fine. 2. The authority stuff has nothing to do with the output connector, so you COULD define 3 different solr connections today and have it all work. 3. Yes, the reason we want it to be a general feature is so that it works the same way across all output connectors.
Karl On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Mark Lugert <[email protected]> wrote: > To further clarify > > 1. Would the scenario below work? > 2. If I have to define 3 solr output connectors, to the same solr, is > manifold smart enough to know that and still properly map all the authority > stuff, especially when the solr filters connects back to manifold? > > thanks, > mark > > From: Mark Lugert <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 12:49 PM > Subject: Re: job variables > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that this should work: > > I have 3 repos, Sharepoint, Alfresco, File System. > > I use the same solr output connector for all 3. > > I use the cmis authority connector for Sharepoing and Alfresco. > > I use the AD Authority Connector for File System. > > The disadvantage to making it solr only is that it won't work for Elastic > search or any other output connector written correct? Just want to make sure > I understand if what I want to do above will even work. > > thanks, > Mark > > > From: Karl Wright <[email protected]> > To: [email protected]; Mark Lugert <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 11:36 AM > Subject: Re: job variables > > There's a ticket, CONNECTORS-552 I believe, and a branch where the > Solr connector was modified to do this. That branch is only > applicable, however, to ManifoldCF 1.0.1, and it is also not the right > way to do it in my opinion. I think we want this to be a general > feature, not connector-specific. There's a fair bit of stuff in the > ticket about how to go about doing it, and I intended to, but events > overtook me. However, I'm happy to triage this for ManifoldCF 1.2, > which is due out now in the end of April. > > If you want to take a crack at coding this yourself, please feel free > to ask questions and/or submit patches. The changes are significant > enough that they should go into a branch first. I'll set up a new > branch for that purpose as soon as 1.1 goes out the door. > > Karl > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Mark Lugert <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Dev group, >> >> I know there is a ticket on adding job specific variables that will be sent >> to the output connector. I think the example given was adding the source so >> in the index you could tell which input connector a piece of content came >> from. >> >> When is this expected to be built and if it's not soon how would you suggest >> building this? I'm more than happy to tackle it, but not sure the correct >> way to do it in manifold. >> >> thanks, >> mark
