On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Alessandro Benedetti < [email protected]> wrote:
> Il 16/dic/2013 08:01 "Raymond Wiker" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > > > I doubt that the parameters are actually in the header - they really > > shouldn't be :-) > > > I agree that they shouldn't be there, but do you have any evidence? > What's wrong with (my) ManifoldCF? > > No, I have no evidence of what is (or is not) in the headers of your SolrJ requests :-) Using my own code for talking to the update/extract handler, I see that all the parameters are passed as POST parameters; the headers include only the sort of things that I would expect to see in the headers. The requests work as they should, so Solr appears to be happy with the format of the requests. Not a proof of anything pertaining to your case, but at least it shows that Solr is happy to accept requests that conform to my assumptions. > Do you have any means of capturing the entire http (POST) request? It > could > > be that SolrJ is adding things to the header. > > I used Fiddler and Charles ( 2 softwares for monitoring http requests). All > the params added to the ContentStreamUpdateRequest appear to be in the > header. > Nothing else added by SolrJ. > Ok. Would it be possible for you to generate a set of captures that could be shared? I'd be happy to take a look. > > > > What container are you running Solr under? Are you accessing Solr > directly, > > or via a proxy? > > Direct access through a SolrCloudServer configured on a zookeper ensemble > of 3 zk. > Solr are running on Jetty. >
