Hi Karl,

That makes sense. I was misusing by checking out the whole tree. I will 
checkout trunk(s) now.

Thanks for the explanation.

Ahmet


On Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:48 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Ahmet,

You should never be checking out the whole manifoldcf tree.  You are expected 
to check out "trunk", or a branch, or a tag individually.  As far as this 
slowing down svn itself -- the directories in question are in fact just 
pointers to versions of files kept already by lucene/solr; they are not 
duplicates.  And, even if you delete them, svn keeps them around because it is 
a source-control system and nothing ever really goes away.  So there would be 
little point in removing them at this point.

It's also a standard release-engineering rule that you *never* delete tags.

Karl





On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Ahmet Arslan <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,
>
>Since they never released, cant we delete these four folders from svn?
>They are 596 MB total and slows down svn operations?
>
>Ahmet
>
>
>
>On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 5:58 PM, Ahmet Arslan <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi Karl,
>
>Thanks for the explanation.
>
>Ahmet
>
>
>
>
>On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 4:24 AM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi Ahmet,
>
>The original plan for the MCF solr plugins was that they were going to be
>released as part of Lucene/Solr.  But they decided not to.  The tags were
>from the time before they became our responsibility.
>
>Karl
>
>
>
>On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Ahmet Arslan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was looing at integration tags. I see source code of solr/lucene checked
>> in the following tags. Is this normal?
>> We have version 2.0 for solr3x and solr4x plugins.
>>
>> du -hs * returned following tags.
>>
>> manifoldcf/integration/solr-4.x/tags
>> 147Mrelease-4.0-SNAPSHOT
>> 147Mrelease-4.0-SNAPSHOT_V1
>>
>> manifoldcf/integration/solr-3.x/tags
>>
>> 151Mrelease-3.5-SNAPSHOT
>> 151Mrelease-3.5-SNAPSHOT_V1
>>
>> Ahmet
>> On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 3:41 AM, Ahmet Arslan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Karl,
>>
>> I created CONNECTORS-914 to mavenize solr3x plugin. renaming directories
>> created a big patch. Please take a look at it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ahmet
>>
>> On Monday, March 31, 2014 5:09 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Please go ahead and create a ticket.  Attach your proposed patch, and I'll
>> have a look at it the first available time.
>>
>>
>> FWIW, I suggest you model a maven build on the elastic search's maven
>> project.  That project also supports generating release candidates, which
>> is essential.
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Karl
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Ahmet Arslan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Karl,
>> >
>> >I was able to build these solr-plugins by
>> >
>> >copy ManifoldCFQParserPlugin and ManifoldCFSearchComponent to a maven
>> project.
>> >copy test Mani*Test files to maven proect
>> >copy solr-mcf to basedir.
>> >
>> >mvn package success. It doesn't need to be built as a module of
>> solr/lucene
>> >
>> >Do you want me to create a ticket?
>> >Ahmet
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Saturday, March 29, 2014 2:34 AM, Karl Wright <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >The solr plugin needs to be built as a module of solr/lucene, so the
>> >build downloads the solr distribution, unpacks it, and then copies the
>> >plugin code into the distribution before building it.
>> >
>> >Karl
>> >
>> >Sent from my Windows Phone
>> >From: Ahmet Arslan
>> >Sent: 3/28/2014 8:01 PM
>> >To: dev
>> >Subject: why solr plugin downloads solr distro?
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >For solr4x plugin why solr-4.6.1-src.tgz is dowloded into
>> >integration/solr-4.x/trunk/download/solr.tgz and expanded into
>> >solr-4.x/trunk/download/solr?
>> >
>> >There are two solr plugins here, binary dependencies(maven, ant)
>> >should enough to compile these, no?
>> >
>> >By the way ant image yields integration/solr-4.x/trunk/build.xml:100:
>> >A zip file cannot include itself on mac os.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Ahmet
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to