FWIW, I just checked signatures, while confirming the accuracy of the verify.xml page. They check out also.
I'd suggest that everyone who wants to check this release out do it soon; we probably want to close the vote somewhere around Monday or Tuesday. Erlend, have you had a chance to look at it? Abe-san? Thanks, Karl On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Graeme Seaton <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > +1 > > Passed 'ant all' and tested with our custom connectors. > > Regards, > > Graeme > > > On 22/04/14 10:40, Karl Wright wrote: > >> I also added, for the main English site, a release verification page stub, >> called "verify.xml", which is linked from the download page. If you would >> like to fill out how to verify a release now, that would be great. >> >> Thanks! >> Karl >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Please feel free to check in your scripts directly into the >>> release-scripts directory. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Karl >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Ahmet Arslan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> * ant all >>>> * mvn package >>>> * MD5, SHA512 (hashes) and GPG (signature) verification on artifacts >>>> >>>> passes for me. >>>> >>>> Here is my +1. >>>> >>>> I created check_signatures.sh that performs MD5, SHA512 (hashes) and GPG >>>> (signature) verification on artifacts. Somehow analogous to >>>> lucene/solr's >>>> smokeTestRelease.py >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ahmet >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thursday, April 17, 2014 4:20 AM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> Ran all tests. >>>> >>>> +1 from me. >>>> >>>> Karl >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Since, in another thread, we've concluded that it is OK to release with >>>>> gpg signatures rather than pgp signatures, I withdraw my -1. I still >>>>> >>>> need >>>> >>>>> to check the candidate though before granting +1. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Ahmet, >>>>>> >>>>>> The signature files, as I feared, are in an incorrect format. >>>>>> >>>>>> I created ticket CONNECTORS-926 for this issue, and provided examples >>>>>> >>>>> of >>>> >>>>> correct format MD5 and SHA file contents. I did not check .ASC, but >>>>>> >>>>> you'll >>>> >>>>> probably want to confirm that too. >>>>>> >>>>>> -1 from me for RC1 for this reason. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Karl >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Ahmet Arslan <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In my previous mail, somehow a whitespace appended to end of URLs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here are clickable ones : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~iorixxx/apache-manifoldcf-1.6-RC1/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is also a release tag at: >>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/manifoldcf/tags/release-1.6-RC1/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ahmet >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 9:51 PM, Ahmet Arslan < >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is obviously a major release, so voting will remain open for two >>>>>>> weeks, unless the RC is respun. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~iorixxx/apache-manifoldcf-1.6-RC1/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is also a release tag at: >>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/manifoldcf/tags/release-1.6-RC1/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Ahmet >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >
