[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14011382#comment-14011382
 ] 

Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-946:
----------------------------------------

The tab issue is a little tricky.  Tabs from multiple connectors (and also the 
names of form elements) must coexist together within a given job, and it is 
perfectly possible with a pipeline for the same tab names to appear more than 
once.

A solution for that is to allow every connector a chance to contextualize its 
specification UI, by passing in a "context string".  The context string *could* 
be just the name of the connection, but that may be too unwieldy.  So, instead, 
I propose that the context string be a simple integer.  The integer would be 
assigned in order, as follows:

- Repository connection would be "1_" (or "1:")
- Translation connections would be "2_" (or "2:") through "<N>_" (or "<N>:")
- Output connection would be "<N+1>_" (or "<N+1>:")

This proposal would also replace an earlier ticket (will look for it) which 
requests that output connections prefix form variables and tab names with short 
unique prefix strings.

prepended to all form variables and tab names

> Add support for pipeline connector
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CONNECTORS-946
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-946
>             Project: ManifoldCF
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Framework crawler agent
>    Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 1.7
>            Reporter: Karl Wright
>            Assignee: Karl Wright
>             Fix For: ManifoldCF 1.7
>
>
> In the Amazon Search Connector, we finally found an example of an output 
> connector that needed to do full document processing in order to work.  This 
> ticket represents work in the framework to create a concept of "pipeline 
> connector".  Pipeline connections would receive RepositoryDocument objects, 
> and transform them to new RepositoryDocument objects.  There would be a 
> single important method:
> {code}
> public void transformDocument(RepositoryDocument rd, 
> ITransformationActivities activities) throws ServiceInterruption, 
> ManifoldCFException;
> {code}
> ... where ITransformationActivities would include a method that would send a 
> RepositoryDocument object onward to either the output connection or to the 
> next pipeline connection.
> Each pipeline connection would have:
> - A name
> - A description
> - Configuration data
> - An optional prerequisite pipeline connection
> Every output connection would have a new field, which is an optional 
> prerequisite pipeline connection.
> This design is based loosely on how mapping connections and authority 
> connections interrelate.  An alternate design would involve having per-job 
> specification information, but I think this would wind up being way too 
> complex for very little benefit, since each pipeline connection/stage would 
> be expected to do relatively simple/granular things, not usually involving 
> interaction with an external system.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to