[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14190455#comment-14190455
]
Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-1089:
-----------------------------------------
Questions and answers:
(a) What authority(s) do you hope to use to secure JDBC-based document content?
I was hoping to tie together 3 authorities in one group. One for user level
ACLs, one for roles, and another for "group" level authorization (although its
possible that group could be a variation of a role in my context). All of these
would be JDBC bound. Please let me know if I missed your question.
(b) Do you need support for both "allow" and "deny" ACLs?
No. Allow meets my use case.
(c) Are there multiple levels of ACL required (e.g. document, folder, share)?
No. Just documents.
(d) What is your preferred schema for access tokens in the database? a joined
table, or a delimiter-separated list?
A joined table would be preferable.
> Add document security support to JDBC connector
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CONNECTORS-1089
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1089
> Project: ManifoldCF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: JDBC connector
> Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 1.8, ManifoldCF 2.0
> Reporter: Karl Wright
> Assignee: Karl Wright
> Fix For: ManifoldCF 1.8, ManifoldCF 2.0
>
>
> JDBC connector needs support for document security.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
