[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14263842#comment-14263842
 ] 

Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-1130:
-----------------------------------------

Hi,

You could develop a Tika plugin within Solr, or you could create a
ticket for this functionality for manifoldcf.



Sent from my Windows Phone
From: hemant Jain (JIRA)
Sent: 1/4/2015 1:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-1130) Adding Key value pairs as
filter while crawling documentum content using ManifoldCf

    [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14263773#comment-14263773
]

hemant Jain commented on CONNECTORS-1130:
-----------------------------------------

Thanks Karl

Is there any way to achieve this functionality, either through
ManifoldCF, SOLR or some other plugin?

Please suggest?

Regards

Hemant jain




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


> Adding Key value pairs as filter while crawling documentum content using 
> ManifoldCf
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CONNECTORS-1130
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1130
>             Project: ManifoldCF
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Documentum connector
>            Reporter: hemant Jain
>            Assignee: Karl Wright
>             Fix For: ManifoldCF 1.9, ManifoldCF 2.1
>
>
> We are planning to replace Autonomy IDOL by SOLR search
> Currently I am using Autonomy Documentum connector to crawl my documentum 
> data.
> Input to this connector is DQL query with some filters in where clause. ie 
> meta data and value
> Is it possible to use key value pairs as filter while crawling the Documentum 
> content using ManifoldCf GUI?. Please suggest.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to