Hi all again Patch attached to Jira issue [1]. Please test the patch and let me know if further changes are needed.
Regards [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1161 2015-08-12 13:24 GMT+02:00 Antonio David Pérez Morales < [email protected]>: > Hi all > > I have continued working on all the things commented in the Jira issue > [1]. After Rafa tested both connectors, we identified some bugs to fix and > some improvements which have already been implemented and committed in the > GitHub repository in the develop branch [2] which will be merged to master > early next week if no further modifications are needed. > > Moreover I have tested the connector building inside ManifoldCF framework > both Maven based and Ant based. > For Maven building, there is only necessary to add the new confluence > connector as a new Maven module in connectors/pom.xml file. > For Ant building, a new build.xml file is provided in the project to build > and register repository and authority connectors in the connectors.xml file > . While building ManifoldCF with the new connector with ant, it fails due > to Guava is not present in the building classpath. To fix that, I have > extended the connector-classpath path at connector-build.xml file with the > Guava dependency located under connector-lib (after executing > make-core-deps target). After that fix, executing ant build finishes > successfully. > > Rafa, Karl, I can provide a patch over the latest code in trunk and attach > it to the Jira issue [1] so that you guys can apply it and test before > merging and committing to trunk. > What do you think? > > Regards > > -------- > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1161 > > [2] > https://github.com/adperezmorales/confluence-manifold-connector/tree/develop > > 2015-08-05 18:30 GMT+02:00 Rafa Haro <[email protected]>: > >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> >> I’m having some issues for testing the connector against a cloud >> instance. Apparently it could be something related to permissions for using >> the REST API for my atlassian user in our instance. I have discussed this >> with the administrator of our Atlassian Cloud instance and he will check if >> there is any granting option for using the REST API for the regular users. >> I hope to have more news tomorrow about this. Anyway, I will setup a local >> Confluence instance also for testing. The thing is I wanted to test with >> our cloud instance because we have a considerable amount of content, so >> would be a great test. >> >> >> >> >> Anyway Antonio, as Karl suggested, I think you can proceed with the final >> additions/modifications we agreed yesterday and start preparing the code >> for contributing. I can help with this and also I will probably need to ask >> Karl for some help also. You can include the User Documentation and with >> that plus code comments/documentation I think we can consider the project >> properly documented. >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Rafa >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On miércoles, ago 5, 2015 at 1:27 p. m., Antonio David Pérez Morales < >> [email protected]>, wrote: >> Hi Karl >> >> >> >> Perfect. Once I finish some things and Rafa finishes his tests, I will >> >> start with that and I will do some tests adding the whole connector into >> >> ManifoldCF structure. >> >> For that, I think it will be useful to merge both Maven modules in order >> to >> >> have only one project (jar) providing both connectors, but let's wait >> until >> >> Rafa's response. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2015-08-05 13:06 GMT+02:00 Karl Wright <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >> > Hi Antonio, >> >> > >> >> > Only ManifoldCF committers can import the project into Apache svn. >> >> > However, before that happens, you will need to insure the following: >> >> > (1) Directory structure is compatible with connectors under the >> >> > "connectors" area of ManifoldCF >> >> > (2) There is both a pom.xml and a build.xml that work >> >> > (3) Any additional imports that you need for building using Ant have >> >> > license research done so that we know they can be included in the Apache >> >> > distribution >> >> > >> >> > Thanks! >> >> > Karl >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Antonio David Pérez Morales < >> >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > Hi Karl >> >> > > >> >> > > After talked with Rafa yesterday, while I'm working on some >> improvements >> >> > > and fixes, Rafa is testing the connector against some Confluence >> >> > instances >> >> > > (on premise and cloud) to check the connector's behavior. >> >> > > After that, we can think to merge both connectors into only one >> project >> >> > > (right now it is a Maven project with two maven modules, one for >> >> > repository >> >> > > connector and one for authority connector) if needed and then move >> >> > towards >> >> > > importing it into Apache SVN. >> >> > > >> >> > > I don't know if I can do that step or else only Manifold committers >> can >> >> > do >> >> > > that. If the second, I can help anyone to move the project into Apache >> >> > SVN. >> >> > > >> >> > > Regards >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > 2015-08-04 20:25 GMT+02:00 Karl Wright <[email protected]>: >> >> > > >> >> > > > If you feel that this connector is largely complete, we can move >> >> > towards >> >> > > > importing it into Apache svn. Please let us know when you are >> ready. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Karl >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Antonio David Pérez Morales < >> >> > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > Hi guys >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Following the work already done in the Confluence connector, I >> have >> >> > > > > developed some tests for the Authority connector and also I have >> >> > fixed >> >> > > > and >> >> > > > > improved the tests related to the repository connector because I >> >> > > changed >> >> > > > > the check to know if a document needs to be reindexed or not, so I >> >> > have >> >> > > > > modified the tests accordingly to avoid problems and in order to >> >> > tests >> >> > > > the >> >> > > > > behavior properly. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Regarding the documentation and after talked with Rafa, I have >> >> > started >> >> > > > with >> >> > > > > the README.md file and I have also put configuration screenshots >> on >> >> > it >> >> > > > > using embedded images (unluckily if you go to GitHub, the embedded >> >> > > images >> >> > > > > are not rendered I don't know why, but using the Markdown content >> >> > in a >> >> > > > > Markdown syntax viewer, the images are properly shown). We have >> >> > agreed >> >> > > > that >> >> > > > > when the connectors are ready to be contributed, then we can port >> the >> >> > > > > documentation to the format expected by Manifold framework. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > As always, if you have any comments or suggestions for >> improvements >> >> > or >> >> > > > new >> >> > > > > requirements, please let me know. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Regards >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > 2015-07-25 10:45 GMT+02:00 Rafa Haro <[email protected]>: >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi Antonio, >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Sorry I have been out for a couple of days, so I couldn't answer >> >> > > until >> >> > > > > > today. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > — >> >> > > > > > Enviado desde Mailbox >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > El jueves, 23 de jul de 2015 a las 21:28, Antonio David Pérez >> >> > > Morales < >> >> > > > > > [email protected]> escribió: >> >> > > > > > Hi devs >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I continue working on the Authority connector for Confluence >> [1]. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Basically I'm finishing the tests and doing some improvements. I >> >> > > would >> >> > > > > like >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > to do some UI tests (like Active Directory connector does), so I >> >> > will >> >> > > > try >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > to include them along with unit tests with mocks. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > In parallel, I'm going to start with the documentation to be >> ready >> >> > > for >> >> > > > > the >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > contribution to Manifold. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Fine. I will take a look to the GitHub project to check the >> >> > > authority >> >> > > > > > connector progress. Actually this one should be easier and >> faster >> >> > to >> >> > > > test >> >> > > > > > for me. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Moreover, right now, I keep separated both repository and >> authority >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > connectors (different modules in the maven project) but once >> >> > > finished, >> >> > > > I >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > think it is better to join them into only one, merging the >> clients >> >> > > used >> >> > > > > to >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > interact with Confluence, and reusing some model classes. I >> will do >> >> > > it >> >> > > > as >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > soon as I finish the tests and some improvements and in parallel >> >> > with >> >> > > > the >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > documentation. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Yeah, there are probably some code that could be merged. If the >> >> > > > > > configuration is barely the same for both clients, they should >> be >> >> > > > merged >> >> > > > > in >> >> > > > > > a single client module. For now, you can keep it at one of the >> >> > > > connectors >> >> > > > > > packages and cross the reference in the other one. As soon as >> you >> >> > > > finish >> >> > > > > > the authority connector I will take a look to see if we can >> merge >> >> > > > > something >> >> > > > > > else. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > As always, if you have any suggestions, please let me know and I >> >> > will >> >> > > > try >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > to include it in the current code. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Regards >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > [1] >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> https://github.com/adperezmorales/confluence-manifold-connector/tree/develop >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > 2015-07-11 12:52 GMT+02:00 Karl Wright <[email protected]>: >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > The feature was developed for a user that was trying to index >> >> > > > documents >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > by creating multiple XML files, each containing a specific >> set of >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > documents. But we don't have any supported connectors yet that >> >> > rely >> >> > > > on >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > this feature. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Thanks, >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Karl >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > From: Antonio David Pérez Morales >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Sent: 7/11/2015 3:55 AM >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > To: [email protected] >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [GSoC] Confluence Authority Connector >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Hi Karl >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Thanks for your response. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > No, I'm not using document components, so I will change the >> call >> >> > to >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > checkDocumentNeedsReindexing. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Only for curiosity, do you have any example showing how to use >> >> > > > document >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > components with the RepositoryDocument model used in Manifold? >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Regards >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > 2015-07-11 1:19 GMT+02:00 Karl Wright <[email protected]>: >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > bq. Karl one question about repository connector document >> >> > > > retainment. >> >> > > > > > I'm >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > using >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > the activities.retainAllComponentDocument(docId) method of >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > IProcessActivity >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > to retain the document and avoid to be reindexed. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Hi Antonio, >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > checkDocumentNeedsReindexing() is the standard way of >> >> > determining >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > whether a >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > document needs to be reindexed or not. You can follow the >> >> > > template >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > present >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > in multiple other connectors that use this method. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > retainAllComponentDocuments() is basically a shorthand way >> of >> >> > > > > > determining >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > the disposition of document components. I don't believe you >> >> > even >> >> > > > use >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > document components in the confluence connector, although I >> >> > could >> >> > > > be >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > wrong >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > about that? In general, if your connector doesn't do >> anything >> >> > > with >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > components at all, you will not need to call this method. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Thanks, >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Karl >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Antonio David Pérez >> Morales < >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Hi devs >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Continuing with the work, I have developed a first >> version of >> >> > > the >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Confluence Authority connector aligned with the ACLs used >> by >> >> > > the >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Confluence >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Repository Connector. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > I have fixed and improved some parts in the repository >> >> > > connector >> >> > > > > and >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > committed the code and also I have updated the Jira issue >> [1] >> >> > > to >> >> > > > > keep >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > track >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > of the new additions. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Both branches have been merged into master and I have >> >> > created a >> >> > > > new >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > develop >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > branch [2] from it, so further improvements and fixes can >> be >> >> > > done >> >> > > > > > from >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > this >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > branch and then merged into master. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Right now, the connectors are in different maven modules >> and >> >> > > > maybe >> >> > > > > in >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > the >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > future I can merge into one single maven project without >> >> > > modules, >> >> > > > > so >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > that >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > with one jar file we will have both connectors ready to be >> >> > used >> >> > > > in >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Manifold. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > As of now, I will work in the Authority connector >> >> > improvements >> >> > > > and >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > tests >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > and also I will do all the things Rafa (or you guys) can >> >> > report >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > regarding >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > the functionality of the connectors. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Karl one question about repository connector document >> >> > > retainment. >> >> > > > > I'm >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > using >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > the activities.retainAllComponentDocument(docId) method of >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > IProcessActivity >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > to retain the document and avoid to be reindexed. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Rafa, while checking and reviewing the code, noticed that >> >> > other >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > connectors >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > are using the >> >> > checkDocumentNeedsReindexing(documentIdentifier, >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > newVersionString) method also from IProcessActivity. I >> >> > checked >> >> > > > the >> >> > > > > > code >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > from both methods and internally they act differently. Is >> it >> >> > > fine >> >> > > > > to >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > use >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > the retainAllComponentDocument or it is better to switch >> to >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > checkDocumentNeedsReindexing one? >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > As always, if you have suggestions about improvements or >> more >> >> > > > > things >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > which >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > can be done for these connectors, please let me know. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Regards >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1161 >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > [2] >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> https://github.com/adperezmorales/confluence-manifold-connector/tree/develop >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > 2015-07-09 17:17 GMT+02:00 Rafa Haro <[email protected]>: >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Hi Antonio, >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the new update. Let me make some comments >> >> > inline: >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Antonio David Pérez >> >> > Morales < >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Hi devs >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > After the midterm, I continue with the proposed work >> and >> >> > I >> >> > > > > > already >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > started >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > to work on the second part of the project, which is >> the >> >> > > > > > development >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > of >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > an >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Authority Connector for Confluence. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > I have created a new branch [1] for that in my GitHub >> >> > > account >> >> > > > > > and I >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > already >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > committed the basic structure of the connector along >> with >> >> > > the >> >> > > > > > code >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > related >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > to Confluence instance configuration. After that I >> will >> >> > > > develop >> >> > > > > > the >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > proper >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > strategy to get the ACLs for the user as stated in the >> >> > > > > proposal. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > For this case, I have been evaluating the two >> scenarios >> >> > > > > contained >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > in >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > the >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > proposal and I will start developing the space-based >> >> > > > > permissions >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > which >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > requires no customizations of Confluence instance >> (coarse >> >> > > > > grain). >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > I made some tests with Confluence APIs trying to go >> more >> >> > > > > > fine-grain >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > using >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > the user groups but there is not endpoint method to >> get >> >> > the >> >> > > > > > groups >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > that >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > can >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > view a specific page. So in the end, I think the >> >> > > space-based >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > permission >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > is >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > a good solution, because implementing a Confluence >> plugin >> >> > > for >> >> > > > > > that >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > to >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > cover >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > some very specific use cases I think most people >> won't be >> >> > > > > willing >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > to >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > patch >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Confluence only for those specific use cases (for >> example >> >> > > > > where a >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > person >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > is >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > not allowed to view a space but it is allowed to view >> a >> >> > > > single >> >> > > > > > page >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > in >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > that >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > space). >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Let's focus right now on permissions at space level. As >> you >> >> > > > said, >> >> > > > > > to >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > patch >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > confluence API is not a good solution, specially for >> those >> >> > > > using >> >> > > > > > it >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > in >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > the >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Cloud. If in the future they extend the API with more >> fine >> >> > > > > grained >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > permissions approach, we can always update later the >> >> > > connector. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > I have also updated the README file putting a guide to >> >> > > > > configure >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > both >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > connectors using screenshots about configuration tabs >> for >> >> > > the >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > connectors. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > I'm using embedded images (using Data URIs syntax for >> >> > > images) >> >> > > > > but >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > it >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > seems >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > they are not supported by GitHub in the README >> (although >> >> > > they >> >> > > > > are >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > in >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > the >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > code, and other Markdown viewers can show them). >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks! >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > The connectors are in separated branches until I merge >> >> > them >> >> > > > > into >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > master. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Moreover, I have been talking and reviewing with Rafa >> >> > > through >> >> > > > > > Skype >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > the >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > current work, and we have agreed to track all the >> things >> >> > > also >> >> > > > > in >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > the >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Jira >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > issue (apart from these mails), so I will put the >> >> > > > configuration >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > screenshots >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > there and the links to the GitHub repositories. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Perfect!. Let me know when we can start testing the >> >> > Authority >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > connector >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > too. My intention is to test the whole connector in a >> real >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > environment >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > extensively sometime before the pencil downs looking for >> >> > > > possible >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > bugs, >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > additions and so on. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Well done so far! >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Cheers, >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Rafa >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Comments and suggestions are more than welcome as >> always. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Regards >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > -------- >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > [1] >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> https://github.com/adperezmorales/confluence-manifold-connector/tree/feature/authority-connector >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > >
