If you want to work on the scripts to do the check in question, that would be a welcome change. ;-)
Karl On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Rafa Haro <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh….I don’t have forrest installed locally….sorry for that. Good to know > for the next one > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Rafa, > > The release scripts do this already, PROVIDED that you have an existing > > installation of forrest, and have set your FORREST_HOME environment > > variable properly. > > The ant build doesn't complain if FORREST_HOME is not set, because most > > people out in the world don't want to build the docs anyway. But the > > release scripts could check for this, yes. > > Anyway, I'm rebuilding the RC's now; about halfway done... > > Karl > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Rafa Haro <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Karl, > >> > >> Is that something that the release’s scripts should had do? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Rafa > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> It appears that the release documentation did not build, and the error > >>> was not caught. > >>> > >>> I will go ahead and publish the master site, but we really have to fix > >>> this. > >>> > >>> Unless there's an actual source change we're fixing, the way I think it > >>> should work is as follows: > >>> > >>> - Rafa spins new RCs, making sure that the documentation builds. > >>> - We vote on the RCs. > >>> - We promote them if they pass. > >>> > >>> Karl > >>> > >>> > >> >
