Graham Lauder wrote:
Jacqueline McNally wrote:
Hello
What do you want me to do?
Have a look at http://marketing.openoffice.org/todos.html and
<snip>
Wup one in the morning. I'll get back to the rest later then we can prioritize whats left and onward from there!
And continuing: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15832 was pretty much superceded by 15833. In fact a new issue needs to be opened to update 15833, seeing as how this one is 2 years old.
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18096 makes for an interesting read and in terms of a philosophical discussion would be a great starting point but the rest is ancient history. For all it's interesting bit's it's time it was consigned to the bin.
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25936 Ok now this one is interesting. started over a year ago. Now considering that this is about the website and given the passion with which the Website has been thrashed on the lists I'm surprised that this issue isn't packed with a lot more feedback and the like. The discussion on the lists and the work going on in SC40 make this pretty much redundant, but it also makes one wonder as to the usefulness of the IZ formula as it seems that people just do NOT read the issue list.
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25003 Good Idea but it's more than a year old.. Beyond resucitation. Someone bury it please
Likewise for
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17263 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=19611
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=19868 Tho I like the idea and we could probably raise this again
To be continued
Cheers Yo
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
