On Wednesday 23 March 2005 14:05, Erwin Tenhumberg wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Thanks for your feedback!
Well, it turns out that in speaking to Daniel, I had misunderstood his point. So unfortunately, my entire lengthy post was ill-timed, unfounded, and just plain wrong. > > Although I'm not a Simon Phipps, I'm definitely willing to help > where I can. Thus, can you please summarize (in a few words if > possible) what the key open questions are that someone from > Sun needs to address? Where should Sun do more, where less? > Where do you see misunderstandings between Sun and the larger > OpenOffice.org community? What action items should I address? Thanks for asking all of those thoughtful questions, but it turns out that Daniel Carrera and I had our wires crossed big time. I completely misunderstood him, and so I fear that I have wasted your time and everyone else's time in this discussion. My apologies to you and to everyone else for sinking so much time into such an errant thought. I certainly will be more judicious in the future in entering into what I perceive to be frays! Also, let me stress that I personally think that Sun is doing a decent job. The entire basis of my comments was that I incorrectly perceived that Daniel was honked off at Sun due to inflexibility. My goal was to encourage an audience for Daniel and a couple others whom I thought were frustrated by being in a minority position vis-a-vis Sun. So I stand greatly chagrined and corrected. Once again, my apologies. Christian Einfeldt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
