I remember an interview with some GCJ developers a few weeks ago when he said that GCJ is done pretty much except for the things done with SWING. Away from that, everything is good. -- Alexandro Colorado Co-Leader of OpenOffice.org Spanish http://es.openoffice.org/
Mensaje citado por Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Claus Agerskov wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Nicu Buculei wrote: > > > > > >>"(iii) you do not distribute additional software intended to replace any > >>component(s) of the Software" > > > > > > This is almost the case when you are dealing with non free software. > > i know, BitMover is the most recent example > > >>so it MAY or MAY NOT be distributed along with a version of OOo built > >>with GCC 4/GCJ? > > > > > > Do you need JRE when OOo is built with GCC 4/GCJ? > > it may be needed: gcj do not replace yet 100% the functionality offered > by JRE (but is very close, one the few remaining obstacles, building > wizards was solved very recently) > > -- > nicu > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
