Alright I updated it with corrected font and have uploaded it to the issue. You can find it here:
http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/26728/Open_World_Small.jpg I have looked at all your suggestions and have kept it pretty much the same way. You can feel free to change it once I upload the file. The file size is 8 MB. What should be the maximum size of a file to upload to an issue? Thanks and keep the suggestions coming. On 5/30/05, Kojo Idrissa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with the idea of having the wording as general as possible. That's > where I think the "Benefit/Product" structure provides you with a lot of > flexibility. That also allows you to change the images, like you said. > > I didn't know the time frame you're working with, but I was thinking that > you might not have time to change pictures around for this conference. > However, if you get a good basic concept you like, you can change the images > later and use that template for other events. > > > On 5/29/05, Adam Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > No problem I enjoyed all your criticisms. I like the ideas of the > > wording. I will say one thing is that I want the wording to be as > > general as possible. This way it is the same wording with different > > images if I wanted to create marketing posters with the same theme. > > > > As far as getting kids with different age groups and ethnicities I > > would prefer to do that, but as of now there are a couple of problems. > > > > 1) This conference is in a month and I need to get one done soon. > > 2) The kids in the picture are my nephews and they don't come with the > > difficulty of getting a model release form :) > > 3) I had this image so this was easy to work with. > > > > Anyway, I will upload a new version soon with some corrections we'll > > see how it goes. > > > > On 5/29/05, Kojo Idrissa < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Adam, > > > > > > In response to you and Tina's discussion regarding the positioning of > the > > > logo, I think putting the picturee on top (with the text positioned > around > > > it in the same way) and the logo on the bottom might be more useful. > That > > > puts the BENEFIT first (increasing "openness" in education and/or for > kids). > > > With that benefit in mind, the viewer of the poster can bring their eyes > > > down to what it is that will PROVIDE them that benefit. Your current > order > > > puts more emphasis on the product, not the benefit it provides. > > > > > > If this is for an educator's conference, they may not be as familiar > with > > > OO.org <http://OO.org>, so placing the logo of an unknown product BEFORE > the > > > benefits it provides may cause the poster to be overlooked. I'm > imagining > > > people seeing an unfamiliar logo and thinking, "Huh?" and moving on. > > > Reversing the position of the logo and the picture (combined with some > of > > > the text changes I suggested in another email) SHOULD provide a familiar > > > image and the suggestion of a benefit, then lead them TO the > > > OO.org<http://OO.org>logo. > > > > > > As an aside, depending on the range of people who will be at this > > > conference, you may want to consider making similar posters (2-3 more, > if > > > you can) that have pictures of kids in different age groups. These kids > look > > > like 5-6 year olds. If you could get some late elementary school aged > kids, > > > some Jr. High kids and some High School kids, that might make an even > LARGER > > > impact. I'm thinking people who don't KNOW what OO.org <http://OO.org > > is > > > MAY think it's something for young children if the current poster is the > > > ONLY one they see. It also wouldn't hurt if you could have girls and > > > children of different ethnic groups in the pictures. That would provide > > > images that would resonate with the widest range of people. > > > > > > Ok, at this point I think I've changed EVERYTHING. Sorry about that. > Just my > > > thoughts. > > > > > > On 5/29/05, Tina Krogull < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Adam, > > > > > > > > [SNIP] > > > > > > > > > Moving the logo to the bottom will give the poster another meaning. With > the > > > > logo at the top the main focus is on OOo. The logo at the bottom and > the > > > > meaning will change to if you are open minded you will also consider > using > > > > OOo. > > > > > > > > But this is just my personal opinion. > > > > > > > > Tina > > > > > > > > ======= At 05-28-2005, 23:03:39 you wrote: ======= > > > > > > > > >I have attached a poster to an issue that I have created. I would > > > > >like your input on how the poster looks and what I can do to change > > > > >it. [SNIP] > > > > > > > >Take into account that this poster is supposed to be used for an > > > > >educational conference so it might not seem appropriate to you, but I > > > > >have ideas of other images that might be good to use for other > > > > >purposes. > > > > >[SNIP] > > > > >One thing I was considering is moving the logo to the bottom and the > > > > >other text up top. Any ideas would be helpful. > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > > >Adam Moore > > > > >Community Volunteer > > > > >OOo blog: AdamMooreOOo.blogspot.com < > http://AdamMooreOOo.blogspot.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Adam Moore > > Community Volunteer > > OOo blog: AdamMooreOOo.blogspot.com > > > > -- Adam Moore Community Volunteer OOo blog: AdamMooreOOo.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
