----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ian Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Marketing] Experience at the NEA Conference


> I run a company and we contribute because the business plan works.

Ian - well said. We use, support and contribute FLOSS software as follows:

We use FLOSS software internally because it saves us a lot of money. (We
also use some closed-source software when the TCO is lower.)

We support FLOSS software because it saves our clients money, and I'd rather
have a couple of days extra consultancy work than the markup on a Windows
server licence any day of the week. (We also support proprietary software,
because sometimes that's what our clients need.)

We release FLOSS software (not, to be fair, in the Office Productivity
space), because it gives us back better software. Where we've done this
particularly is where we've written software for our internal use, that we
were never intending to sell. By making the source-code available, we have
found that others have used our software for themselves, but then added
features to it that we would never have thought of (or had time to add even
if we had), but now get to use as well.

We also release closed-source software in some cases, because it makes us
more money in particular markets than we believe we could make selling
services added to releasing the software under, say, the GPL.

I include the stuff about proprietary software explicitly to make the point
that, as an organisation, we are NOT using FLOSS software for "evangelical
reasons", or to the exclusion of proprietary software. We consider FLOSS as
one alternative in a market of others, and use it only when there are good
business reasons to do so - now THAT is an argument that, I hope, all
businesses should be able to relate to.

The "use it because it costs less" argument was the one we started with. The
"release source code to internal stuff because then it comes back with extra
features" argument isn't something I'd thought of at all, until I read "The
Cathedral and the Bazaar", but in our experience it's definitely worked.

Regards,

Mark Harrison


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to