Journals are just not doing benchmarks or product reviews anymore, so it gets harder to find anything published that's less than a warmed over press release.

Though their review of digital photo editing tools was egregious and heading a step in the direction of MS only product reviews, I think it would be a coup to get OOo, StarOffice, Hancom, and others reviewed by Consumer Reports.

Or how about pooling resources or at least coordinating with other groups using OpenDocument? A lot of farmers do this, e.g. dairy council.

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Steven Shelton wrote:

I get this a lot, myself. The impression really comes off as being one that open source supporters are so partisan about anything anti-Microsoft that they are blind to some of the real advantages offered by some Microsoft products.

I've seen far more of the opposite. A few MS die-hards work their way into the bureacracy at a company, agency or institution and then turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to anything non-Microsoft be it closed source or open source. That goes even after agreed upon in advance methodology show data which by agreed upon in advance critera show the MS products to be the least viable for that given context.

[snip]
without objectivity there is no credibility.

This is true, but there are relatively few objective sources any more.
Pretty much everyone has already either 1) been burned badly by MS' defects or pricing or 2) pine away for a chance to meet Chairman Bill who is so wealthy.

Brand recognition cuts both ways. If you make inefficient, defective products and over-charge for them and engage in illegal / predatory business practices (all established facts) for a long enough time, eventually people will remember.

-Lars
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
        Software patents harm all Net-based business, write your MEP:
        http://wwwdb.europarl.eu.int/ep6/owa/p_meps2.repartition?ilg=EN


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to