I wonder how many comments will actually come from real OpenOffice.org contributors or at least people who have expressed serious believable interest in developing for OpenOffice.org.
I'm personally less interested in philosophical comments from open source "advocates" who for example do not have to feed their kids with their OpenOffice.org development work, or at least do not take those developers into consideration. Anybody can ask for a GPL and a foundation, but it's not that easy to solve the related issues, e.g. sponsorship, affected jobs, etc. I'm again not saying that the GPL or a foundation is bad, but I'm not a fan of discussions by people who are not (or at least much less) personally affected (I mean the non-OOo-developers who might comment to the article). Best regards, Erwin swhiser wrote:
http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/42367/index.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
