On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 16:24 -0400, Chad Smith wrote: > > I'm delighted to be proven right in my proclaimation that Mass was > premature. I'm delighted to be proven right that ODF is not important, > at > all. Casual users of OOo are likely not going to use ODF, just like > very few > ever used the old OOo format, (except by accident). >
Hang on a moment, how has a challenge (not a victory) by Microsoft in one particular State, representing a population significantly smaller than that of Belgium, represent a "proof"? I assume, therefore, that the victory of Lotus 123 in gaining some major US clients in the early 1900s demonstrated to you that Microsoft Excel was completely irrelevant? Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
