Malice, prejudice or ignorance, maybe even emergent behavior like you see with ants, but not a conspiracy. However, that doesn't stop many people from trying to dismiss questions or critique as 'conspiracy'.

Anyway, in this particular context, the product and company in question have been around a long time. Functionally and appearance-wise, that product is a superset of an existing crossplatform product sold by the same company. So it's not a case of a small startup trying to get established. It's a decision simply to support a specific platform.

Furthermore, the nature of those specific products means that researchers,
both corporate and academic, are the main users.  They are a population
where MS Windows has a much lower marketshare than in the general
population.

All that can be learned from the company web site and a pair of web searches.

Personally, I recall that when negotiating an organization-wide site license for the cross-platform products above, the local vendor was pushing the MS-only one to the point where he eventually made misleading and incorrect statements. He also tried to do an end run around me and deal with my boss at the time. To me that smacks of an agenda and, again, indicative of a technical, contractual and/or ideological problem resulting in being unable to or unwilling to expand to other platforms.

-Lars
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
        Software patents endanger the legal certainty of software.
        Keep them out of the EU by writing your MEP, keep the market open.



On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Steven Shelton wrote:

Lars D. Noodén wrote:

To me it is indicative of a technical, contractual and/or ideological
problem resulting in being unable to or unwilling to expand to other
platforms. That kind of inflexibility tends not to survive in business.


Or it could be a market analysis decision: "because XX% of users use Windows and only YY% use linux, Mac, etc. we can predict that developing and promoting a version for those other platforms would cost us $Z.ZZ per unit, and we would make $V.VV per unit. Since $V.VV is less than $Z.ZZ it doesn't make sense financially to support another platform."

*shrug*

I'm about as anti-MS as one can get, but not everything is a conspiracy.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to