Ian Lynch wrote:
The .org in the productname directly makes clear this is an Open Source
project and people are tempted to try out the name in a browser to see
more about the product. So actually I think the .org is a good thing
from a marketing point of view.
+1
Nah, I don't like the .org at all. And I don't think it conveys "open
souce" in the slightest. You don't hear people say "Linux.org" or
"Firefox.org". There is no connection between a .org extension and an
open source project. The only other project I can think of that has a
.org is the name is X.org, and it's not the type of project that you try
to sell to the uneducated masses. I think that word "open" is more
likely to convey the concept of open source.
If we had a vote for a name change, I'd vote in favour of dropping the .org
Best,
Daniel.
--
/\/`) http://oooauthors.org
/\/_/ http://opendocumentfellowship.org
/\/_/
\/_/ I am not over-weight, I am under-tall.
/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
