+1 for B. I'd support B with capslock for "Included." I support it because it doesn't have the flaws of the others:
- A is too much like 1.x, and gives the impression that 2.0 isn't much different. - C and D's curvy lines are too dark, whereas in B the white lines add contrast - C's "Included" introduces an extra--and unnecessary--colour. Also, it's too thin. - D's "Included" is too dark, and makes the whole thing look like a dark spot with darker lettering. :P - RG> PS: Hello world. On 2/20/06, Bernhard Dippold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Daniel Carrera schrieb: > > > Bernhard Dippold wrote: > > > >> in the art project we designed different proposals for OEM labels > >> that should be sticked on PCs delivered with OpenOffice.org. > > > > [snip] > > > >> > >> http://www.familie-dippold.de/OEM_label_vote.html > > > > > > Could we use approval voting? > > I didn't think, that it would be necessary, but if you want to, you > may do so. > > Your vote will be split into partial votes, so your vote stays as > important as the voting of everybody else. > > > [...] > > > > I give +1 to A and B. > > So I count your voting as > > + 0.5 for A > and > + 0.5 for B > > Best regards > > Bernhard > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
