Hi,
On 2006-05-04, at 10:22 , Daniel Carrera wrote:
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
and have done fairly well, despite Ian's implicit criticism,
What criticism? He said that a more provoctive headline/post
attracts more digs.
The discussion was actually on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and did not focus on
being provocative--we all agree that being provocative is good and to
suggest otherwise is rather a shameless act of rhetorical twisting--
but on advocating that Microsoft Office adopt the ODF, a point
initially raised by John, agreed to by Ian, and with which I
disagreed, in conjunction with Sophie and Cor.
To read the thread, see:
http://marketing.openoffice.org/servlets/BrowseList?
list=pr&by=thread&from=1365726
The larger point is whether it makes sense for OOo to advocate MSFT's
employment of the ODF. I think not. OOo is a competitor of MS Office
and will benefit from MS being behind increasingly perceived as being
out of step.
Your group, the OpenDocument Fellowship, is of course free to
advocate whatever you will, and I wish you the best.
Louis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
