Hello Daniel, I don't want to dwell into this (except that you seem to say that the OOoAuthors docs are released under the PDL, the GPL, and the Creative Commons?), I was merely pointing out the official documentation place for OpenOffice.org, and that Catharina should pay attention to any licensing terms, including, in the first place, the PDL.
Thank you, Charles. Daniel Carrera a écrit : > On Wed, 2006-23-08 at 17:47 +0200, Charles Schulz wrote: > >> Hello Catharina, >> In general, try to read the licensing terms carefully as the >> OpenOffice.org documentation has a specific license, the PDL, and there >> is a breadth of other docs (such as the ones Daniel mentioned) all over >> the Net that may not have the same licensing scheme. >> > > I doubt that Catharina would really care about using a more restrictive > license like the PDL instead of the more flexible options at OOoAuthors, > but for other OOo members I'd like to mention that these docs *are* > available under the PDL, as Charles knows. In particular, here is the > license page for the English guides: > > http://oooauthors.org/en/authors/userguide2/LICENSE > > "This is free documentation. You can distribute it under the terms of > the GPL, version 2 or later, or the Creative Commons Attribution > license. In addition, you may use it under the PDL as 'original > documentation'." > > Cheers, > Daniel. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
