Lars, good idea, but the following question that comes to my mind is about the money: if Google charges for the storage, can we/are we entitled to charge a fee ourselves, how much, and under what form?
I'd love to have one of the Google representatives here speak out. Zaheda? Kai? I have to say that I'm quite surprized by the level of interest of Google online office products in comparison to OOo. When doing migrations, hard to convince people usually point out the lack of features symmetry and MS's alleged breadth of functionnalities. Google Docs and Spreadsheets, although very nice tools, stand at the opposite of this trend by being easy to use and not overloaded. And all of the sudden customers are willing to migrate en masse to Google solutions. That is very surprizing. Best, Charles. Lars D. Noodén a écrit : > Googles apps, not OOo get a mention in this article: > http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/10276/1023/ > > However, it might be possible to approach the FAA or Google about OOo. > > The way Google could work with OOo could be through a plugin which > connects to some kind of networked storage or versioning system at > Google. > That would eliminate some of the problems with networked applications. > > -Lars > > Lars Noodén ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Ensure access to your data now and in the future > http://opendocumentfellowship.org/about_us/contribute > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
