Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > ... Andy Updegrove is predicting failure for OOXML in its > rushed quest to be yet another ISO standard for office documents. > > http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=2007090315253367
I can see several advantages here regardless of the outcome. One would be a re-examination of the role of Ecma, and for that matter fast-tracking, in the process of building world standards. The other would be to point out that every dime that goes to MS is, in effect, condoning such unethical business methods. It's not like this is the first time MS has persisted with questionable practices even after continued scrutiny. -Lars --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
