On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 06:22:31 -0500, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
She is either seriously biassed or she doesn't know anything about OO.o
(i.e. what she's talking about). How can she dislike something she has
no knowledge of?
Either way, her article was rubbish.
I think this article is a testcase of what PR is all about. However I
still see this like a big poke on the OOo marketing team to either debate
it on the mailing list or get our asses to work on a comeback. So I think
is more a test on the project itself than how much leg this article has.
Mike
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Le 18 sept. 08 à 09:12, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
Hi Alexandro,
Important article that talks about OpenOffice.org being too slow and
how they will launch an office alternative that praise to run faster
and on more OS (Windows CE, PocketPC, FreeBSD).
http://opensource.sys-con.com/node/680195
thanks for pointing this out.
Well, I guess the article says it all. Nice wordings the authors
found. Looking at the SoftMaker website doesn't reveal any better.
They now praise integrated PDF export as new feature... :-)
Exactly. But mind that TextMaker also make quality software. Some
questions for them: Do they use ODF? No? Is this "change we can believe
in"? You know the drill... :-)
Charles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Alexandro Colorado
CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
http://es.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
